News

London’s Foolish Attempt to Battle the Latest Crime Wave

London is a great city for liberals. The bastion of progressive policy that leads the world in how to be better. The police don’t even carry guns! It is the progressive ideology that makes the city one of the safest in the world. It’s a haven for people of every race and creed. Terrorism, discrimination and crime are a threat to no one!

You’ve seen the headlines. You know where this is going. London is under siege from a new wave of crime. Property crime, assaults, terrorism and now murder have all grown to dangerous proportions. Let’s take a look at London and her policies and see if there is a lesson hidden somewhere.

London Crime Wave

This story begins with a look at skyrocketing crime in London. The major headline that you have probably seen is that London’s murder rate exceeded that of New York City. This is a first for recorded history, and it has now persisted for two consecutive months.

To be fair, the London murder problem is only barely ahead of New York, but considering that it has been lower for more than a hundred consecutive years, it’s a big deal. In February and March each, London had one more than New York. We’ll see if the trend continues in April.

The real story is that crime in London has been on the rise for a long time. The initial spike began with a firearms ban in the 90s. In the last five years, things have accelerated. Knife crime in the city is up 46 percent from 2014.

In the last year, things have been more dramatic. Overall firearm crime rose by 20 percent last year. Knife crime similarly rose by 21 percent in the same period. Since London has long boasted some of the strictest gun control in the world, many are wondering what else the city can do to defend itself.

New Tactics

Gun crime is rising, but guns are already banned. There is only one obvious solution: ban knives. Since gun bans have effectively eliminated gun crime and it hasn’t been steadily rising for years, a knife ban is sure to finish off all components of danger in London. The city’s new campaign is “Save a life — surrender your knife.” This is sure to work. As the city’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, already put it, “there is never a reason to carry a knife.”

And, he’s right. No one has ever used a knife for something simple like cutting a loose thread on their clothing. Carrying a knife surely couldn’t help someone survive outside of the city. It definitely couldn’t be used for simple car repair. In more serious circumstances, knives are absolutely useless for cutting seat belts after a car accident. Most importantly, no knife has ever been used to administer emergency first aid. That would be ridiculous. Who would use a deadly weapon to try and save someone?

Of course, all of this is ignoring the most obvious. Knives are an obsolete tool for cutting food. In the forward-thinking, progressive city of London, only certified professionals should be allowed to reduce food into edible bites.

Are You Tired of Being Right?

We’ve been mocking the notion of “common sense” gun control for years. This is why. The conclusions are obvious and inescapable. Banning guns doesn’t stop crime. It doesn’t even save lives. In the case of London, crime has only risen since guns were confiscated.

When the liberals see the fruits of their failure, they never learn a lesson. Rather than empower London citizens to defend themselves from criminals, they steer harder into absurdity and tell us there is no reason to carry a knife.

What comes after knives? After all, blunt objects are frequently dangerous. No one needs a hammer in their home. Will London eventually try to regulate bare hands? Or, will they eventually learn from their mistakes and try a new tactic. The latest surge in violence coincides perfectly with the London police removing their longstanding stop and frisk policies.

Taking direct action against criminals is the only way to reduce crime, and the easiest way to accomplish that is to empower the citizens. Otherwise, it’s only a matter of time before you have to ban food to keep people from choking.

~ American Gun News


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

13 Responses

  1. LIBERALS look at this gun control doesn’t work. People kill people not guns. They will use anything available. Check statistics more people are killed with fists than the guns you want to ban

  2. THIS IS JUST THE DEMOCRATS WAY TO TAKE CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY. THEY WANT TO BE THE ONLY ONES WITH AUTHORITY.

  3. Liberals are stupid..Why ask them any questions….How many interviews have we witnessed asking a Liberal protester “Why are you here”?? All you get is a DAHHHH??? They are useful mindless idiots for Globalists like Soros & his Pals. Only way to talk to a lib is a 2×4 between the eyes..

  4. London…. The Progressive “NIGHTMARE”. Look what progressive gets you. A murder rate that is now a laughing stock. For over a hundred years they have had a much much lower murder rate than New York. Both cities a cesspool of immigrants, but London has truly lost their grip on their own country. MUSLIM AS MAYOR!!!!. That is unmistakably the poorest decision ever made and a perfect example of WHY you do not allow this type of thing to take place. The UK has made Monumentally POOR decisions especially when it comes to the muslim rag heads.These people bring with them a failed understanding of western Life and a government run by one has no hope of being successful in any part whether it be In International trade or law whatever. Human relations ettc. This is a doomed experiment just the same as our own muslim black president. Their loyalties lie outside of their scope of what they should be. No matter the country, Progressive is what what has destroyed the prosperity and integrity of both government and societies morals.Of course this will be an unpopular yet rue statement as well. Women in government office Bad for any country. This is how we find ourselves inviting unwanted people such as muslim refugees who should simply be put in tent cities near home and allowed to go back once hostilities are done. They should NOT be brought to this or any country for any period of time, taxiing our system with freebies such as housing, food stamps,medical coverage and education. All things we cannot even furnish our own people. Oh, waith, this is WHY we cannot provide for our own, because we allow hundreds of thousands of these people to come here indefinitely rather than send them back after a period of time. Refugee does NOT mean permanent resident. Yet the people come here and the Progressive Government keeps them to bolster their voting numbers in order to ensure implementation of their Socialist/Communist Agenda to take away our rights and put America under their thumb. This is why they want guns, especially Assault weapons. The main reason they want them is because those are the weapons most helpful should we have to fight a Second Revolution.A second Revolution is Exactly where we will end up the way things are headed. If we do not change the course of government we will be fighting mark my words…I will be prepared…. Will You???.

  5. you assholes in London deserve all your getting you stupid assholes for having dirtbags like the asshole Mayor of London and all the fuckin Muslims all of Europe is going to hell keep the bastards over there we don’t want scum here

  6. Stupid is as stupid does, Brits. Your a sour bunch of dip shit’s. Eat your steak with a spoon I guess?

  7. why is Soros not stripped of his US citizen ship he has lied on his application send the Bastard to Hungary also his useless fuckin familly or send a contract

  8. Just what do you expect, hugs & kisses with a muslim in charge!

  9. To try to use London as an example of a failed gun control policy is little short of despicable. There has never been a concealed carry permit in the UK, ever. Londons problems arise from Tony Blairs policy of joining Bushs wars in the middle east. London is suffering from naked terrorism with guns, knives and vehicles. For this publication to try to make a comparison with that and the levels of gun violence in the streets of the USA is disgusting

  10. Thank you mayor Khan. You have shown me that you are even more ignorant that I first believed. You want to further disarm the people there in London. How much more will you do next next to keep people from defending there self in anyway. Will the people be allowed to carry a umbrella too. I would want a baseball bat or there a cricket bat for self defense. They all could be on their way to play cricket.

  11. The “Left” is soooo afraid of everything that they want to ban anything, which will lead to citizens having nothing. Sort of like what’s between politicians ears.

  12. Until they stop wasting time trying to control who has the EASILY MADE at home inanimate objects and start doing something with the actual criminals they will always fail and as liberals always do BLAME places that refused to enact their restrictive policies as if those inanimate objects can only be LEGALLY MADE by corporations and LEGALLY purchased by the criminals.

  13. The author doesn’t want to ban guns or knives, but he apparently approves of police stopping and searching people without probable cause. (What are they supposed to be looking for when they frisk you?)

    This is illustrative of how right-wing myopia mirrors left-wing myopia – only care about people’s rights under certain circumstances, while endorsing government rights violations against individuals outside those circumstances, in the name of “public safety” or whatever. Both sides do it. Both are leading, in their own ways, toward greater authoritarian control, even while allegedly opposing this.

    I suspect that many honestly don’t see it. They think they can benefit public safety or society by pursuing a “zero tolerance” policy for guns, or a “war on drugs”, or having surveillance cameras everywhere as in Britain, or massive government electronic surveillance and data harvesting as in the U.S., to apprehend terrorists, without undermining and endangering the freedom of society as a whole.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *